What is the formalized goal of all target pointing methods? Surely is to get the target you want to observe into the field of view of your telescope eyepiece (into the circular portion of the sky you see when looking through your eyepiece).
How to make that task so trivial that there is no question of how to do that even for a little kid? Think about the Moon. Obviously, you can see the target in the sky and point to it with your finger. What could be more trivial than that? Nothing! That's because the eyepiece FOV (the Field Of View) is equal to your eye's and the telescope you are pointing is just a finger on your hand.
Is it possible to point to, let's say, the Horse Head Nebula, which is hard to see even through a telescope, with the same ease and triviality? Yes! By using the Telrad Pattern matching (TPM) method.
OK. So what's the heck is that TPM afterall? Almost exactly the same thing as pointing with your finger, but:
Instead of the Moon limb, you are pointing at multiple naked eye stars near your invisible target. You can call it an Asterism if you wish. But the difference is that it's a dynamic thing. You can add or remove stars (or even bright DSOs) in it as needed or desired.
And instead of the finger contour, you are pointing with the special reticle "projected" in the sky. The primary difference from the fingertip is that it's much larger and has more features to catch your eye.
With the addition of exact virtual copies of the above (stars and reticle) on the digital star chart computer showing how these two should look in the sky aligned to get your invisible target in the center of the FOV of your eyepiece granted. Which is frankly to enhance your brain at the task of pointing.
So, the TPM is about the target enhancement, pointing finger enhancement, and the human brain enhancement all the way to making the task as easy as finger-pointing at the Moon. That's all.
Or, thinking in reverse: the TPM is as natural as pointing with your finger by moving your stretched out arm until the contour of your finger is covering the Moon's limb because in your brain the procedure of finger-pointing at an object means just having the image of the target's contours matching contours of your finger in a predetermined way naturally associated with pointing at that target. Complex? But that just a weird way the human pointing process could be described. For the brain it's natural! Tough target? Just enhance what you are usually use for pointing to a certain level and allow the brain to do the work you are perfecting from the time you have opened your eyes for the first time: match patterns!
Why can't we point just by a "small finger" like a red dot or a laser beam's end? Because the naked eye stars are usually far apart, thus the single dot positioning will be just guessing the invisible object's location, not pointing. The guesswork is reducing the chance your target will be close to the center, so if it's not obvious in the FOV bright and familiarly shaped object - you may spend hours hunting for it around that guessed spot again and again.
Due to the large size and multiple alignment points in the Telrad reticle, instead of guessing you are aligning these points with multiple visible stars and thus automatically triangulating the target's position from most reliable matching points close to each other or aligned with each other in a certain way which helps with the precise matching of views a lot. Each parameter you brain is taking into the account automatically while matching these views feature by feature is adding to the accuracy of pointing. And that's not by tedious measurements from multiple points (a well known geometric method), you are matching the pattern unconsciously, with the goal of making it look exactly the same as on the chart's picture. That "the same" is based on zillions of factors catching in your neurons, not just a single dot.
There are some caveats though, which many who heard about the Telrad and even the TPM method might be overlooking, so lets polish your understanding of TPM a little before getting to the actual step by step procedure:
- A telescope you can move manually (even if by using an electronic remote control device or technology).
- Telrad or QuInsight collimating pointing device. The Red Dot, Green laser, optical finders with more than 1x magnification wouldn't work. Its mount must hold the alignment with the telescope optical axis while you are using it.
- Digital star chart capable of displaying a precise model of Telrad or QuInsight rings pattern on the star chart as a live overlay image. The only digital star chart in existence which natively supports both Telrad and Quinsight reticles' precise model is DSO Planner. As of 2020, other apps have a rudimentary support for Telrad only (see "Before you start" #4 below why), but some apps have a feature which allows to show multiple eyepieces FOV rings, which can be hacked together to mimic Telrad or QuInsight rings in a usable way (see User Note 6 below).
- Either a good knowledge of constellation stars or the digital star chart app feature showing on the screen the chart of the sky region behind it when you hold the screen up to the sky (often called Digital Compass). Such a feature will help you to distinguish bright stars in the sky until you memorize them well enough. The DSO Planner app is one step ahead by providing that feature along with the additional Digital Horizon feature, which in is also leveling the horizon line on the chart with the real thing. So you can distinguish constellations easier from a possibly awkward posture behind Telrad. Or if you have the smartphone mounted on the OTA.
- Enough stars, which you can see by your naked eye. If you are in an urban zone where you can barely see 2-3 stars, even after prolonged darkness adaptation, you are in trouble. With the experience using TPM and QuInsight device (vs Telrad) it might become possible though. As you master the method you could do with just a SINGLE star visible close enough to the rings.
Before you start
- While you are a beginner, make sure you are using the widest FOV eyepiece available for your telescope, as initially your target might end up within 0.5-1 degrees from the FOV center after TPM.
- Make sure the Telrad is precisely aligned with the center of the eyepiece FOV (you may want to temporarily install a higher zoom eyepiece to double-check for that).
- Using your star chart app, find an abundant with stars region of the sky at a convenient for Telrad viewing altitude (but no lower than 45 deg). Center one star in the rings. Center that same star on your star chart with Telrad overlay On. Observe stars behind Telrad rings and compare the view with the chart (you can move the OTA around the location to have stars touching the rings, just adjust the star chart accordingly too). If you see that in the sky either:
- A ring's size doesn't match the view.
- Angle of gaps markers in the rings doesn't match the view.
- The width of the rings overlay doesn't match the view.
- Then go to the app settings and change parameters used to draw Telrad rings on the chart so everything you see in the sky on a test star pattern is as precise match to the star chart's image as possible. You might need to revisit settings multiple times. That's the key to the ultimate success of TPM in any practical situation from lack of the naked eye stars to horizon features blocking the open view of a pattern. And that's what all other apps on the market are lacking badly. Keep in mind that you will need to re-calibrate your Telrad (like above) after the reticle refocusing again (it must be refocused after a while as it's often hiking out of focus after multiple axis alignments unconsciously performed in the same direction).
- Make sure the app is showing the star chart for your actual local time and geographic location, and that its real-time clock is ticking (so the chart is updated at least every 30 sec).
- Select the object you want to see in the telescope on the star chart and make it centered in the Telrad rings (some apps may require special measures turned on to keep the object always centered on the chart as the stars are moving with time so the app might move them away from Telrad's center).
- Using a low star chart zoom, figure what constellation or/and bright stars are surrounding the target.
- Find these constellations/stars in the sky (use the apps digital compass for assistance with the general direction).
- Point the telescope in that direction roughly.
- Prepare to work with Telrad (e.g. move your chair, drop your knee pad, don eyeglasses).
- Zoom the chart to have Telrad rings filling as much space on the screen as needed to show at least 2 bright stars which you can clearly distinguish in the sky AND on the chart in a favorable pattern inside and/or around the rings. Ideally, you want stars touching one of the rings, or nearly precisely in between two of them. Later, as you get a certain "spatial feeling" in the sky you would do very well with almost any pattern.
- The final step is to look through Telrad and move the telescope until the real Telrad rings and corresponding real stars you see in the sky are creating the exact same pattern which you see on the star chart.
As soon as the pattern is matched, you can be 100% sure your target is in the field of view of your eyepiece. Even if you cannot see it there from the first glance! As many truly serious objects require the field identification which allows you to find the exact spot where the object or its contours lay between faint stars. And for that, you need a really good digital star chart again, which is capable of showing you ALL stars which you could possibly see in your telescope, so you could match it with that eyepiece pattern as well but now with the frame of your eyepiece FOV displayed on the star chart. Try that with a paper star atlas!
An avid TPM user's notes
- Ideally, as a beginner, you want to compare the sky view and the chart side by side. So you can get used to the way the star chart app is abstracting the reality. There will be never an exact match, so you need to adjust your "pattern matching brain algorithm" to the same level you have it adjusted for matching lets say an animal which you see on a painting, for example. For that you need the Telrad (or QuInsight) mounted in a way making that easy. For a decade I've been using my Telrad on the side of the 12" Dobsonian. Yes, under the eyepiece, not above it as everyone else do. So the pointing looked like targeting with a shoulder-mounted bazooka! Not for everyone's knees, I understand, but extremely convenient for side by side comparison of the handheld screen and the Telrad view.
- To compare by just memorizing the pattern use gaps in Telrad rings. I have my Telrad oriented in a way so one of the gaps is clearly on the top of the view, that's considered a 12 o'clock orientation. Got the idea already? Now, I can remember the pattern as "the top star is within ring 3 and 2 at 1:30 o'clock, the lower star is at 7:45 outside of the ring 3 for a bit less than a degree". That's enough for a better than 0.5 degrees accuracy of pointing, which is all I need to go straight to my main eyepiece at 90x magnification after sweeping my Dob in a fluid wide arch with a brief kneeling at the end of it (in like 5 seconds). The only app supporting the Telrad gaps angle adjustment is the DSO Planner again.
- Ideally, you want that pair of stars to match landing on opposite sides from the target (to counter-cancel various hard to avoid errors). But as your experience grows, stars on one side and even a single star away from the rings could work in a pinch. That allows to point in urban environment with a lot of the sky obscured or hiding in the light pollution.
- Remember about atmospheric extinction. It's distorting star patterns relative to the unchanged Telrad rings drawn by the app as ideal circles. The error is not very significant but might create a confusion. Especially when you have your rings calibrated in the app conveniently pointing at some stars close to the horizon on a warm nigh (high refraction).
- All other pointing methods available for amateurs I have ever tried or know about (except for the ancient Star Hopping and the 2020es high tech Celestron Star Sense Explorer) can't match the TPM in simplicity, reliability, and speed as all of them are either relative to some initially calibrated point thus prone to the mechanical failures or deficiencies, or incapable of compensating for ever changing conditions or user errors. Others are simply too slow either in the preparation or in the application (I'm leaving the side by side comparison to a later write up maybe).
- If you've got a star chart app that doesn't have adjustable Telrad rings see if it has a possibility to show multiple eyepiece FOV rings instead. In that case, you can try to model Telrad rings one by one by adding special "ultra-wide" fake eyepieces tweaking their parameters until the EP FOV ring matches one of the Telrad rings you see in the sky. Match by the same edge of the ring each time (i.e. by inside contour only to avoid introducing a ~0.1 deg error) as the width of these fake rings is usually nit adjustable. Sadly, you can't adjust the gaps angle that way either, so you will lose some in the pointing accuracy, speed, and convenience due to inability to leverage 8-16 gaps markers.
- The nearly-religious care of your eyes darkness adaptation is the key for any astronomy observations of deep sky objects success, the same is true for the TPM success as even though you are starting from really bright stars, the view background full of faint stars makes the procedure more accurate, intuitive, and quick as it becomes a natural habit. Study proper techniques for darkness adaptation, its preservation, regaining, and maintenance. They are especially crucial in a light polluted observing location. Improve your observatory equipment and location to help with that as much as possible too.